About this Show

Viewpoint With Eliot Spitzer

News/Business. (2012) (CC) (Stereo)

NETWORK

DURATION
01:00:00

RATING
PG

SCANNED IN
San Francisco, CA, USA

SOURCE
Comcast Cable

TUNER
Virtual Ch. 107 (CURNT)

VIDEO CODEC
mpeg2video

AUDIO CODEC
ac3

PIXEL WIDTH
528

PIXEL HEIGHT
480

TOPIC FREQUENCY

Sandy 7, New York 6, Eliot 5, Europe 3, Obama 3, Newsweek 3, United States Senate 2, California 2, Us 2, Robert Reich 2, Eliot Spitzer 2, Mo Rocca 2, Murdoch 2, Biden 2, Romney 2, Jack Welch 2, Chris Christie 2, Dennis Kelleher 2, Christie 2, Scandinavia 1,
Borrow a DVD
of this show
  Current    Viewpoint With Eliot Spitzer    News/Business.   
   (2012)  (CC) (Stereo)  

    November 2, 2012
    8:00 - 9:00pm PDT  

8:00pm
red cross on behalf of the victims of the hurricane. www.redcross.org . good night, everybody. [ ♪ theme music ♪ ] >> eliot: good evening i'm eliot spitzer and this is "viewpoint." the last employment report before tuesday's election is in. with something for both candidates to talk about. we're going to go over all the numbers in a moment with former labor secretary robert reich but first we'll update you on the ongoing recovery from hurricane sandy. after the better part of the week without heat, light and other necessities millions in the new york city are desperate for some relief. so a bit of good news. hundreds of thousands in manhattan could get power back by midnight tonight. yet around the region, many are waiting as long as four hours to
8:01pm
buy gas. fortunately new york's subway commuter rails are coming back and officials say the gas shortage should ease by midweek. meanwhile, the annual new york marathon has been canceled. many said it would divert needed resources from the cleanup and it was insensitive to the millions still suffering from the effects of the storm. adding up the sandy's grim totals. at least 102 dead including 41 in new york alone. some 3.6 million homes and businesses still without power. and $50 billion in losses. and now for some good news for the economy. the president's re-election campaign. the economy beat a consensus of economists expectations added 184,000 new jobs last month and the private sector while it shed 13,000 public sector jobs, netting out a gain of 171,000
8:02pm
jobs. and revised employment reports forage and september added another 84,000. givingunemployment is higher, giving mitt romney a talking point. >> unemployment today is higher than on the day barack obama took office. >> eliot: what he didn't say was that the economy was losing 800,000 jobs a month when obama took office. during his term the economy added millions of jobs. professor at us berkeley goldman school of public policy and author of "beyond outrage: what has gone wrong with our economy and our democracy and how to fix it." hello, mr. secretary. >> hello eliot.
8:03pm
>> eliot: there was a massive conspiracy that the economy was picking up steam. do you think the numbers prove there is an accelerating fact that there improvement. >> the reason why unemployment ticked up was because more people are trying to find jobs now, and in that particular survey the bureau of labor statistics only looks at the number of people who are trying to find jobs. when more people are trying to because they are more optimistic about there being jobs there that means the unemployment rate actually ironically goes up. the real important number is the establishment survey number. that 171,000 new jobs is a major marker and it shows indubitably that the trend is in the right direction. >> eliot: now you have written so persuasively, and in my class i use a chart that you use in one of your other books that shows the wages unfortunately have been stagnant, and the data continues to show that wages are
8:04pm
stagnant and over the period the increased productiveity of workers has not come to their benefit. this is one of the crises of middle class wealth destruction over the past few years. how do we address that issue. >> in a number of ways, that is the most disturbing trend underlying the jobs picture. it has been going on for a long time since 2000, the typical wage has trended inflation. the only way to get wages back is you create more demand for workers. that means that employers and consumers have got to have simply more money. it means the government cannot right now cut government spending. that would be a disaster. we've got to wage the minimum wage. we've got to make sure that we have a wpa or civilian conservation corp, probably not
8:05pm
politically possible now but when president obama get a second term we might be able to get that done because we have a lot of long-term un unemployed. i hope some of the tax breaks, such as the breaks on social security payroll taxes can be continued onward from december. i think that's very important to keep money in the hands of the middle class and enabling their spending, and jobs. >> eliot: all the miles you're talking b all of which i'm fully in accord with all predicated with president obama to guide the path. i agree, if he gets the second term. one of the premise that i view and i think you view as one of the misguided policies of mitt romney if you lower the tax breaks you get an outbreak of investment. there was a survey that disputed that. they polled it under political pressure. what is your wisdom as someone
8:06pm
who has studied this in great death, would this bring investment as mitt romney high hypothesizes. >> no, between cutting marginal tax rates on the top and creating more jobs or economic growth. clinton increased taxes and we had jobs than when bush cut taxes. yet average economic growth during the years was better than it has been since. look at nations even in germany and europe scandinavia, they have faster economic growth, particularly germany and scandinavia and higher wages than we have even with the europe crisis, yet their taxes on the wealthy are much higher than ours. this whole supply of economics
8:07pm
approach is pure bunk. >> eliot: you know, yourer you're using the academic word for it, bunk. i appreciate that. that's what we need to hear. >> i'll use the joe biden word, malarky. >> eliot: i'm taking either one. there is still the centerpiece of the argument from the other side, the notion that austerity and you referred to european track record, the idea that austerity would settle the crisis. in europe what has it led to. >> a deeper and deeper recession, and worse recession in comparison to the rest of the economy. the huge issue is not the deficit number itself. it's the ratio of the debt to the economy over all. if the economy is growing
8:08pm
because government is the spender of last resort and encouraging investment, education, job training, infrastructure, that growth actually enables the debt to shrink as proportion of the economy over all. europe and particularly spain and britain are the worst examples. they embarked on austerity economics, what happens? they actually shrink their economy. they go into recession, and their debt or deficit becomes a bigger problem as as the overall economy. >> eliot: i want to take snippets of this conversation and send it to every voter, and that would be a guarantee that there would an second term for president obama. previews of uc berkeley goldman school of public policy.
8:09pm
as always, thank you. >> thanks. >> eliot: dennis kelleher president and ceo of better markets, nonpartisan organization promoting public interestage financial reform. den, you heard robert reich who has not gotten enough attention that is important that that we need to focus on. >> the most important number to talk about outside of the political context. it's a long-term problem for the economy, for the middle class. the increase in unemployment is purely the affect of more looking for jobs. i would have talked about how i'm going to get more manufacturing jobs and wage stagnation instead of this good signal of getting people back to work. >> eliot: it has struck me all through the debate, not that i
8:10pm
want to give them advice or wish them well, but the romney ryan ticket failed to capitalize on what vice president biden said because of the wage earnings down for several families, and that is what reflected in the wage data point. what are we missing here. >> well, you know, it's the political calculation. not only is it a nice number you can point to and target to when president obama took office, no matter how misleading those fact free numbers are but it enables him to stay within the obama frame. real wages wages after inflation have been dropping for a significant period of time. it's hard to pin all of that on president obama. and the goal here, of course, with governor romney is that its everything that i can think of that has happened in this country that is negative is due to president obama.
8:11pm
it enforces his primary club he has been trying to use against the president. he has to use it in a way that misrepresents what is going on. not only are the numbers for october good, but august and september were revised upwards. so we have a trend in employment here that is good news for the american people across the board. >> eliot: that's exactly right. 8% was the emotionally important threshold with unemployment above 8% mitt romney had an easier time, using that as a club where it has settled below 8% whether it's 7.8 harder for him to do that. looking at the sector where jobs were created every sector had growth even in manufacturing. >> yes, there is more growth in the service industry, health industry, but these are not high paying jobs being created. he didn't focus on that, and that was a mistake for him. what people are feeling is not the unemployment rate number is
8:12pm
7.8 or 7.9 but the concern is are we moving ahead do we have more money in our pockets. he had an opportunity to connect with people, and he didn't do it. >> eliot: money in the pocket is what voters care about that's where theywhat they feel at the gas pump. that perhaps would have been a better link for him. dennis, an area where you are focus with such acuity has the mega bank model failed, and we got to move to something else? >> i wish you were right. we still have the unlimited resources of wall street purchasing as many allies and politicians as they can and they've plowed an enormous amount of money both seen and un unseen into these elections. they're going to pick up favored office holders after this
8:13pm
election. it's no longer it's only republicans who are for financial reform and for these have been important senators and others who haven't been comfortably within the financial reform arena who are now saying these banks are too big and they pose too big a threat and they need to be regulated in a way that brings them down. i wouldn't say that we have an intellectual consensus yet, but it's trending that way. unfortunately, wall street money is trying to buy some push back and i think they'll succeed this tuesday. >> eliot: you're accurately assessing the landscape with wall street lobbying, i think there is a growing consensus. it is still in the growing stages, but many people, simon johnson who are saying that era is over, and i think we'll see a reforealation of the mega banks. i want to drive back to what will be a legislative issue
8:14pm
right after the election, the fiscal cliff. something that businesses say they're very worried about. consumers are worried about. is there an ember of hopish an agreement to be reached that does not pickpocket the middle class. >> i'mparticularly if president obama wins re' election, he's made it clear he's not going to extend the bush tax cuts for the top wage earners. house republicans have not moved at all towards a willingness to do that. having a compromise remains to be seen for me. perhaps the election will be such that there will be chastening with weighing in and those who want to keep the tax cuts in place. i don't see it right now but we'll have to wait to tuesday. >> eliot: i think the white house will do nothing, let those tax cuts expire and then negotiate from a position of strength and then they can get
8:15pm
the deal they want. why is that wrong as a negotiating strategy? >> well, you know, you could go through it in a lot of different ways when it makes sense and when it doesn't make sense. one of the things that is getting very little attention. while the business community appears to come together and started to talk responsibly about shared sacrifice in a deal that doesn't just put all the burden on the middle class the question is whether or not their actions are going to be anywhere near consistent with their lips. so far a lot of talk, not a lot of action. this is a leadership moment for business in the united states. is it really going to step up and take a position that done in a responsible way and we're willing to do our part while we're asking others to do theirs. that's the question that we're going to face. that's what we need to see happen. >> eliot: we'll know soon enough if that is the case. there were those who said they knew taxes had to go up. that was a traumatic change and who knows what that pour tends
8:16pm
for the future. ben white and dennis kelleher great to have you both on the program. jobs weren't the only topic on the campaign trail today. inin the home stretch good morning ladies and gentlemen, i'm captain whitaker. >> there's 102 souls on board. >> let's get em' tucked in we're ready to push. >> current tv knows there are two sides to every story. >> i have no control on my side! >> this is south jet 227, we are in a dive! here we go! brace for impact! >> you saved a lot of lives. << uh! >> he was very worried. >> looks like a cool character. >> he reminds you of. >> sully. >> the guy who landed the plane in the hudson. >> he has to be a hero. >> he definitely a hero, yea. >> now, what if you heard the other side of the story? >> i had a couple beers the night before the flight. >> you had alcohol in your system. that could be life in prison. >> are you hiding something? >> well, there's a darker side to this guy. >> makes it a lot more complicated. >> there's more depth there.
8:17pm
>> he's not god himself. >> so it makes it much more interesting. >> you saved my mom. >> it's much more intriguing now. >> while there are two sides to every story... >> it's a lie. ... in the end, there's only one truth. >> flight. only in theaters november 2nd.
8:18pm
8:19pm
>> eliot: new york city is trying to get back to normal as quickly as possible, after hurricane sandy. but it's not normal yet. which brings us to our number of the day. 26.2. that's the length of the marathon that will not be run by nearly 50,000 people sunday. after some argument, the annual new york city marathon has been called off. we're still too close to the tragedy of hurricane sandy and the ongoing clean this, hurricane fatalities are still turning up in staten island where the marathon would have started. and power generators, fresh water, and other resources brought in for runners are desperately needed by those who are still without shelter. staten island hilton garden inn already said they weren't going
8:20pm
to kick out displaced residents in the hotel just to honor reservations for the marathon. then there is personnel. the marathon usually requires more than a thousand police officers to man the route. but all the emergency workers prison, fire emts have been working tirelessly all week. the police have even asked pore help from department >> eliot: with three days to go in what has been a year-long marathon, president obama and mitt romney are running on vapors and adrenaline. hopscotching across the country in an effort to be both desperate to make a closing pitch that will persuade the american public. romney was in wisconsin today with his final plea to voters which was the same as it was on day one. i am for business. >> every entrepreneur, every small business person.
8:21pm
every job creator will know that for the first time in four years the government of the united states likes business and loves the jobs and higher wages businesses can bring. [ cheering ] >> eliot: president obama in ohio in his clogging argument paints himself as son who will do whatever it takes for the american people. >> obama: we've made real progress, but we are here today because we know we've got more work to do. you may not agree with every decision i've made. you may be frustrated sometimes by the pace of change. but you know what i believe. you know where i stand. you know i tell the truth. you know that i i'll fight for you and your families every single day as hard as how. you know that. [ cheering ] >> eliot: i love that passion. for more on the last days of the presidential campaign, let's bring in michael tomasky special correspondent for
8:22pm
"newsweek" and the daily beast who wrote this week's cover for "newsweek" "can obama close the deal?" >> thank you. >> eliot: is anyone tuning in any more after months and moss of this rhetoric. >> we are exhausted but i did see one hole in ohio that showed obama ahead by three points, but there was still 7% or 8% still undecided in this poll in ohio. i guess some people are still out there scratching their chins, thinking about what they're going to do. >> eliot: i was back when i was in the arena in that game ways skeptical that on the last weekend the undecided would even turn out. i would look at the raw nubs and say that's how it's going to break. i hope i'm not proven wrong, that the president will take ohio and be okay. do the job numbers matter politically? everyone was waiting. will they matter? >> yes, i think they will
8:23pm
matter. you know, around the margins, i don't think that the average americans who are more interested in this weekend's football games are sitting around obsessing about the jobs numbers and the readjustments from august and september the way you and i are. but i do think they matter. i think they that create a narrative that says this is a recovery. this is an economy that has been gaining 150 jobs per month this year, and that's a pretty good number given where we were--it's a very good number given where we were four years ago. it's a pretty good number given where we were two years ago. i do think that people hear that on the news. they talk about that with their neighbors, and i some kind of difference. >> eliot: jack welch with standing, i think there has been an improvement. consumer confidence going up, which goes to the point you made how does the public feel about things, that's a hugely
8:24pm
important predictor. i'm geeky enough to think that it is an important indicator. hurricane sandy has been a devastating blow to new york city and those in its path. it was also a perfect storm for mitt romney, it seems to me. am i wrong about that? >> no, i think you're right. i put it this way. i wrote this earlier this week. nine days ago on that wednesday a week and two days ago, mitt romney's people were calling reporters and saying, we have this in the bag. it was two days after the third debate incidentally. a debate that most people judged the president won although not in the fashion that romney won the first debate. even though the debate, it did not stop the romney people from saying we feel really good. we think we have this. we think we're on the verge of 305 electoral votes so on and so forth.
8:25pm
that was nine days ago. two days ago--two days ago his campaign had a conference call with political reporters to persuade them that the race wasn't over. they were still in it, they had a shot, and they felt pretty good about it. in seven days they went from this race is over to wait, no the rate isn't over. that's what sandy did. >> eliot: the reason for that was because sandy was the perfect metaphor you need a government to come in and do certain things a government that is smart capable, driven by people who believe in its purpose and mission and it evoked the images of katrina which is the worst metaphor for mitt romney. and i think the president has surfed the wrong of this, and it's on the emotions of the public. >> yes, i don't think obama was trying to use it politically. i think he was trying to do thinks job. i think chris christie was trying to do his job.
8:26pm
i also think that chris christie understands that he faces re-election in a pretty democratic state, and obama understands that he faces re-election next week. those are political realities. they're politicians, and they don't deny that. but they were doing their jobs, and i think christie's role here, as i'm sure you know as a former governor, it was a big deal for christie to come out and do what he did. that also really hurt romney. >> eliot: yes, that was the political maneuver of the week. he played it perfectly. switch gears for a moment. i don't want to say that anything is over and done, but the president is comfortable. the united states senate, a pivot or blocking position for the past couple of years. any particular race there that you think is interesting that has evolved that is demonstrative with what in our politics over the last couple of months? >> i think there are several. the north dakota race there is a
8:27pm
good chance. i think missouri, claire mccaskill has a good chance to hold her seat. the most important race that i would point to is the indiana race which is richard murdoch the tee party republican who beat dick lugar in a primary versus joe donnelly the republican. or the democrat, excuse me. donnelly, according to a poll that came out today, has an 11-point lead. let me explain take a second to explain why i think this is the most important race. we have those fiscal cliff negotiations coming up after the election and before the beginning of the year. if obama wins re-election, obama is going to be negotiating with probably a republican house and with probably a democratic-controlled senate but a senate where there will be more than 40 republicans who could full filibuster. now if murdoch wins then every republican in the united states senate will be terrified of a primary from a murdoch type,
8:28pm
they won't do a thing to compromise with the president. but if murdoch loses then a lot of republicans in the united states senate are going to say well, that kind of tea party politics doesn't work. i can repel such a challenge, and that gives them a little bit more room to maneuver and compromise with the president. i think that's really the most important senate race. >> eliot: michael, i think that is exquisitely important analysis and exactly right. which way the republican party leans after next tuesday does it determine it needs to cut back to the middle and negotiate? or does it feel that the tea party is exactly the most important question of how congress acts and whether or not the president gets things done over the next couple of years. correspondent for "newsweek" and the daily beast am michael tomasky thank you for your time. >> my pleasure. >> eliot: one endorsement we knew was coming. c. montgomery burns of
8:29pm
the natural energy of peanuts and delicious, soft caramel. to fill you up and keep you moving, whatever your moves. payday. fill up and go!
8:30pm
8:31pm
8:32pm
>> eliot: still to come, if it's the most basic tenant of democracy, why is voting so complicated. we'll talk about our flawed system next. but first jon stewart on ohio. mr. burns on romney and fox and friends on edge. when it doesn't fit anywhere else, we put it in the viewfinder. [ ♪ music ♪ ] >> there have been good things about voting early. vice president biden take it away. >> i'm not saying that each early voter gets a free cheeseburger, but i'm not saying that they don't either. [ thunder ] >> i have to say despite all those inimaginebly horrible good jobs numbers i'm feeling confident. those are drapes to hang in the burns bedroom? >> the franken bedroom. >> if your voter suppression throughout this beautiful country enables romney to oust
8:33pm
barack obama, we will burn this mother. [ bleep ] down. >> number six. >> if you vote early you don't have to pay taxes. i'm sorry that's not accurate. >> o.h. god i love that. it's so fun. >> yes, it's not that fun. our city has got a way better calling response thing. new york! yeah. >> number two. >> early voters will receive a $5 million donation from donald trump. >> mr. attorney general, as i remember, mitt romney wrote that op ed that said the gm should go through a managed bankruptcy, which they did which the president says that's essentially what car industry. mr. attorney general.
8:34pm
>> what is that related to? >> what. >> a deal that went down before the storm ever happened. if bloomberg gets this date, you're going to come out and endorse president obama and then tie it to climate change, they have to go through this. that was a back door deal because no one in their right mind would go out yesterday and say i'm endorseing president obama because of his climate change stance. that's crazy town. >> thethe number one good thing about voting early, ladies and gentlemen. >> honestly, don't you want this election over with already. >> eliot: i think the vice president got it right with that last one. more with mon current tv encourages you to vote on november 6th but just as importantly to take the time to learn about each candidate's stance on the issues that matter to you. to help you make informed decisions, watch current tv's politically direct lineup.
8:35pm
only on current tv. vote smart. our democracy depends on an informed electorate.
8:36pm
♪ ♪ the trucks are going farther. the new 2013 ram 1500. ♪ ♪ with the best-in-class fuel economy. engineered to move heaven and earth. ♪ ♪
8:37pm
guts. glory. ram. >> eliot: more than ten years since the 2000 presidential election debacle, and still the system is deeply flawed. votes go uncounted. voters are disenfranchised, and the winner of the popular vote won't necessarily be the one named president. is this really the best we can do? the makers of the new nonpartisan documentary "electoral dysfunction" certainly don't think so. >> colored pencils and markers. who is voting for colored pencil pencils? okay. who is voting for markers? markers have won the popular vote. [ cheering ] now it was time to warp these young minds by introducing them to the electoral college. in the end the whole election came down state.
8:38pm
>> table five's elector angel come on down. this will decide the whole thing. elector how do you cast your vote? >> colored pencils. >> it's not fair. it's not just about the electorate vote. it's about everybody's vote. >> cenk: brilliant. the host of the movie and correspondent for cbs sundays morning, mo rocca. >> i think first graders have an uncorrupted sense of fairness. that was real. it's a hot button issue, colored pencils versus markers. >> eliot: and states right did not leap from their lips. >> that did not come up, but we're the only democracy at this point with this system when it was created it wasn't that uncommon but it's well past
8:39pm
sell-by date and i'm tired of the two sides of the issues. >> eliot: years ago when states were sovereign, there was respecting the power. it's an idiotic power. i was around electorate once and i felt important. >> us an electorate once. >> eliot: when i was attorney general, governor, you get to hold those positions but fundamentally the electorate college is obsolete. there is an every to undo it. some lawyers came up with to have states pass laws. will that succeed? >> it's halfway there. enough states need to agree to it, that collectively equal 270 votes, the winning number to win the vote. it started with maryland, and if you google" national popular vote plan" and it should end it. >> eliot: and if california
8:40pm
jumps in. >> california has signed on. that's right. if mitt romney wins the popular vote and barack obama wins the electoral college vote then i think the electoral college will blow up. it will explode. republicans won't stand for that that. >> eliot: jack welch will say its conspiracy. there are other flaws in the voting system. there rampant with the intellectual problems that we have to deal with. >> the point of origin is the constitution which does not confirm the affirmative right to vote. early on the framers passed it over to the states. everything became localized which is why we have 13,000 different voting districts with its own ballot design. ballot designed by count supervisors, while i respect them they're not designers. that's why you get the butterfly
8:41pm
ballot. >> eliot: you're being kind to them. you're right by and large they're hard working good folks. sometimes the design errors are simply poor judgment or a mistake. but there are efforts by many people to prevent people to vote. >> absolutely. one of the things that has been so localized ie, chaotic there is too much latitude for cha canary. not just because i like to use the word can canary. we need a grown up, ie federal standards who say these are the always and these are going to be uniform. not just different i.d. requirements from district to district. >> eliot: that's right. and we could have an uniform voting list that would get rid of all this stuff about needing to show i.d. and who is on the list and who is being purged from the list and ugly words. those sorts of things could be done, but could you get a political consensus for that these days. >> i think there is a political
8:42pm
consensus to get rid--among people there consensus among constituents, those who are supposed to matter, to get rid of the electoral college. people might say maybe we can fix this thing. as far as uniformity, i don't know the path to that. >> eliot: i can tell you back after 2000 when i was attorney general here in new york, we did a study of new york's study system, it was arcane, and yet we went to the state legislature and said here are some simple ideas, neither party wanted to do it because the status quo was very powerful. >> there is so much insecurity when you go in with touch voting, i think enough people will be worried about this, especially if there are recounts in close elections maybe that will be enough. >> eliot: quickly, how did you
8:43pm
get interested in this? >> i'll tell you three great made this movie. it's a documentary, they came to me and it's the kind of topic that initially made me think this makes people's eyes glaze over. yet, i wanted the creative challenge to take this arguably important topic and make it go down easy. >> eliot: the use of colored pencils and markers was brilliant. mo rocca, thank you so much for your time. >> thank you. >> eliot: one issue up for vote, warning labels for genetically modified food. that's c
8:44pm
fruit just got cooler. fruit on one side, cool on the other. new ice breakers duo. a fruity, cool way to break the ice.
8:45pm
8:46pm
>> eliot: i think you can guess who is getting my endorsement for president this year, and yes my candidate can run on his record. that's next on my view. but at 10:00 p.m. eastern be sure to join jennifer granholm in "the war room." she'll have a round table discussion on today's job report with former obama administration
8:47pm
economic adviser austin golsby that's later tonight 10:00 p.m. our conversation is with you the viewer because we're independent. >>here's how you can connect with "viewpoint with eliot spitzer." >>questions, of course, need to be answered. >>we will not settle for the easy answers. 1cccm01398
8:48pm
8:49pm
8:50pm
8:51pm
8:52pm
8:53pm
8:54pm
8:55pm
8:56pm
8:57pm
8:58pm
8:59pm